Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

changed users to mail ids, added mail_template to integration fields #1673

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

hasinaxp
Copy link
Contributor

@hasinaxp hasinaxp commented Dec 19, 2024

…for mail channel

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced message processing to support multiple users.
    • Added a required mail_template field for mail integration configuration.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and logging during email processing.
  • Tests

    • Expanded test coverage for channel configurations and message processing.
    • Updated tests to validate handling of multiple users in message processing.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to multiple files to support processing messages for multiple users. In kairon/chat/utils.py, the process_messages_via_bot method signature is updated to accept a list of users instead of a single user. The kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py file is updated to leverage this change, modifying message processing logic. The metadata/integrations.yml file adds a new required field for mail integration, and the test suite in tests/unit_test/chat/chat_test.py is adjusted to accommodate these changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
kairon/chat/utils.py Updated process_messages_via_bot method to accept List[str] for users and messages.
kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py Modified message processing to use list of users, improved error handling, and refined email criteria generation.
metadata/integrations.yml Added mail_template as a required field in mail integration configuration.
tests/unit_test/chat/chat_test.py Updated test methods to support list of users in message processing.

Suggested reviewers

  • hiteshghuge

Possibly related PRs

  • Demo mail code and test cases fixed #1562: The MailProcessor class in this PR modifies how messages are processed and introduces a list of users to the process_messages method, which is directly related to the changes made in the process_messages_via_bot method of the ChatUtils class in the main PR.
  • Mail channel filter #1651: This PR enhances the MailProcessor class with new filtering capabilities for email processing, which aligns with the changes in the main PR that also focus on handling multiple users in message processing.
  • slots fix for email #1655: Similar to the main PR, this PR modifies the MailProcessor class to improve the handling of email fetching criteria, which is relevant to the changes made in the process_messages_via_bot method regarding user handling.

Poem

🐰 Rabbits hop through code so bright,
Multiple users now take flight!
Messages dance in lists so clean,
A coding symphony, if you know what I mean!
Refactoring with bunny glee,
Making messaging more free! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 212158e and 0900525.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
tests/unit_test/chat/chat_test.py (1)

959-959: Validate the length consistency of messages vs. users.

When calling ChatUtils.process_messages_via_bot, make sure the length of messages equals the length of the users array. Otherwise, an IndexError will occur on user lookup inside the loop.

kairon/chat/utils.py (2)

48-51: Confirm that passing a list of users is necessary.

You've shifted from a single 'user' to multiple 'users'. Confirm that all relevant caller sites are adjusted to supply this list, avoiding TypeErrors or unexpected behavior.


70-71: Optimal approach for enumerating messages and users.

You are correctly enumerating messages and retrieving users[index]. As a future improvement, consider zip(...) if the arrays are guaranteed the same length. That can simplify indexing.

kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py (2)

180-180: Consider renaming 'users' to 'mail_ids' or similar.

Using 'users' to store email addresses might cause confusion with typical user IDs. A more descriptive name like 'mail_ids' clarifies usage.


210-210: Pass meaningful 'is_integration_user' value if needed.

Currently, the is_integration_user is passed as False. Validate that you do not require the integration flag for specialized logic.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e31e904 and 212158e.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • kairon/chat/utils.py (4 hunks)
  • kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py (3 hunks)
  • metadata/integrations.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/unit_test/chat/chat_test.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/unit_test/chat/chat_test.py (1)

949-949: Ensure the messages/users arrays are aligned.

Here we define users = ["test_user", "test_user2"], implying two distinct users for a list of messages. Confirm that the count and order of users correspond to the appropriate entries in messages to avoid index out of range or logic issues.

metadata/integrations.yml (1)

93-93: Verify backward compatibility with mandatory mail_template.

Now that mail_template is part of the required fields, existing deployments without mail_template might break. Validate that the code gracefully handles empty or missing mail_template values.

kairon/chat/utils.py (1)

3-3: Use of typing.List is correct and beneficial.

Importing List, Dict, Text explicitly clarifies your type hints. This improvement helps maintain code readability and aids in static analysis.

kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py (1)

193-193: Careful usage of mail['mail_id'].

Ensure mail_id is always present in the dictionary. If any item in batch lacks 'mail_id', a KeyError would occur. Add error handling for missing keys.

kairon/chat/utils.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@sfahad1414 sfahad1414 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@sfahad1414 sfahad1414 merged commit 45a5000 into digiteinfotech:master Dec 19, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants